Denalysis

Analysis doesn't get a lot of credit in my book.

When someone presents me with a full analysis of their behaviors and shadows, I respond with a tilted head and a wide open "maybe..."

In that field, the judgments sift down. The moralizations clarify. The curiosity of emergence returns.

There's nothing wrong with any idea you might have about why what is happening is happening.

Yet, attaching to your ideas of the cause invites you to combat the assigned cause, (war!) and this is a compelling invitation. It invites you to spend all that energy you don't know what else to do with.

A lot of people may read this or have encountered this and decide that they must drop their idea of what is happening, drop every and any idea of why what is happening is happening.

This is more analysis.

The hallmark of analysis is judgment, decision.

What I recommend is more curiosity.

It's hard to do this alone, and it's hard to do this with anyone prone to analysis.

That's what I'm here for.